[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4641687.OeSyoZmW7s@avalon>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 17:01:41 +0100
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, wsa@...-dreams.de, horms@...ge.net.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/05 v2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: r7s72100 single pin macros
Hi Magnus,
Thank you for the patches.
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 11:38:14 Magnus Damm wrote:
> From: Magnus Damm <damm@...nsource.se>
>
> Introduce macros that allow description of one pin per line.
> Compared to the other ways of doing this, using this style
> we can compresses the description of each pin from 9 to 1 line.
>
> Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm@...nsource.se>
> ---
>
> This patch uses RZ_PMX_GROUP and RZ_GROUPS, thanks Laurent!
>
> drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r7s72100.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>
> --- 0003/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r7s72100.c
> +++ work/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r7s72100.c 2013-12-16
19:14:30.000000000
> +0900 @@ -98,9 +98,30 @@ static struct sh_pfc_pin pinmux_pins[] =
>
> #define RZ_PORT_PIN(bank, pin) (((bank) * 16) + (pin))
>
> +#define __RZ_STR(pfx, hw, bank, pin, sfx) \
> + pfx##_##hw##_p##bank##_##pin####sfx
Do you mean s/####sfx/##sfx/ ?
> +
> +#define RZ_PIN_AND_MUX(pfx, hw, bank, pin, fn) \
> +static const unsigned int __RZ_STR(pfx, hw, bank, pin, _pins)[] = { \
> + RZ_PORT_PIN(bank, pin), \
> +}; \
> +static const unsigned int __RZ_STR(pfx, hw, bank, pin, _mux)[] = { \
> + P_##bank##_##pin##_MARK_FN##fn, \
> +};
I would have preferred keeping the trailing semicolon (and comma in the
RZ_GROUPS macro) out of the macro, but that won't be possible as the
RZ_PIN_AND_MUX and RZ_GROUPS macros are used as arguments to the SCIF macros
in the next patch.
> +
> +#define RZ_PMX_GROUP(pfx, hw, bank, pin, fn) \
> + SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(pfx##_##hw##_p##bank##_##pin),
> +
> +#define __RZ_GROUPS(x) #x
Can't you replace __RZ_GROUPS() by __stringify() ?
> +#define RZ_GROUPS(pfx, hw, bank, pin, fn) \
> + __RZ_GROUPS(pfx##_##hw##_p##bank##_##pin),
> +
> static const struct sh_pfc_pin_group pinmux_groups[] = {
> };
>
> +static const char * const scif2_groups[] = {
> +};
I think this should be part of patch 04/05.
> static const struct sh_pfc_function pinmux_functions[] = {
> };
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists