[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131217161022.GA13205@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 17:10:22 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
eranian@...gle.com, andi@...stfloor.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/15] perf, x86: Use context switch callback to flush
LBR stack
* Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@...el.com> wrote:
> From: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
>
> Enable pmu context switch callback if LBR is used. Use the callback
> to flush LBR stack when process is scheduled in.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
I see several fundamental problems with your series:
1)
Minimal changelogs like the ones in this series are completely
unacceptable! You seem to be copying the changelog style of Andi
Kleen: written to inform as little as possible.
Don't do that if you want your patches to get anywhere, instead adapt
the akpm style:
"Please update the changelog to describe the current behavior.
Please also describe why you think that behavior should be changed.
ie: what's the reason for this patch.
"
2)
Also, there are frequent typos.
3)
Plus you didn't Cc: other perf maintainers like myself or Arnaldo.
4)
How can users actually make use of the changes you are doing? Cite
actual perf analysis usecases in the 0/15 description and describe how
your patches improve/enable all that.
Please fix all those problems and resend.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists