linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: ide: Include appropriate header file in ide-cd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131217164403.GD1062@leaf>
Date:	Tue, 17 Dec 2013 08:44:03 -0800
From:	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:	Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: ide: Include appropriate header file in
 ide-cd_verbose.c

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:19:21PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:38:16PM +0530, Rashika Kheria wrote:
> > Include appropriate header file ide-cd.h in ide-cd_verbose.c because
> > function ide_cd_log_error() has its prototype declaration in ide-cd.h.
> > Also, include linux/ide.h because it contains certain declarations
> > necessary for including ide-cd.h.
> > 
> > This eliminates the following warnings in ide-cd_verbose.c:
> > drivers/ide/ide-cd_verbose.c:251:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘ide_cd_log_error’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 
> drivers/ide/ is open only to fixes for serious, real bugs - nothing
> else. I wouldn't waste my time with it if I were you.

A quick check of "git log drivers/ide/" turns up a pile of fixes and
cleanups; for instance:

c2f7d1e ide: pmac: remove unnecessary pci_set_drvdata()
a6fd6063 ide: cs5536: use module_pci_driver()
58e48be ide: pmac: Remove casting the return value which is a void pointer
64110c1 ide: sgiioc4: Staticize ioc4_ide_attach_one()
70ddce8 ide: palm_bk3710: add missing __iomem annotation

The two proposed patches here are extremely low risk, don't actually
change the compiled code in any way like some of those did, and fix real
compiler warnings.

- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/