[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8067325.5UvABaxqIZ@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 03:35:14 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...elcunningham.com.au>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, tomaz.solc@...lix.org,
aaron.lu@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata, freezer: avoid block device removal while system is frozen
On Sunday, December 15, 2013 08:21:36 AM Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On 15/12/13 07:36, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 03:31:21PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >> So, all this is about hibernation? Does that mean that it's safe to
> >> unfreeze before invoking resume? ie. we currently do,
> >>
> >> freeze
> >> suspend devs
> >> resume devs
> >> unfreeze
> >>
> >> If we can just do,
> >>
> >> freeze
> >> suspend devs
> >> unfreeze
> >> resume devs
> > Ummm... even better, does that mean, in the long term, we can decouple
> > freezing and device pm operations? If this is just about hibernation,
> > there's no reason to wrap device driver pm ops with freezer, right?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> Rafael has spent far more time than me thinking about the semantics
> here, so I'd like to defer to him. Rafael?...
Please see my reply to Tejun.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists