lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 16 Dec 2013 20:58:48 -0700
From:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To:	Li Wang <liwang@...ntukylin.com>
Cc:	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Sage Weil <sage@...tank.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Yunchuan Wen <yunchuanwen@...ntukylin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] VFS: Directory level cache cleaning

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:08:16AM +0800, Li Wang wrote:
> As far as we know, fadvise(DONTNEED) does not support metadata
> cache cleaning. We think that is desirable under massive small files
> situations. Another thing is that do people accept the behavior
> of feeding a directory fd to fadvise will recusively clean all
> page caches of files inside that directory?

I think there's a really good permissions-related question here.
If that's an acceptable interface, should one have to be CAP_SYS_ADMIN
to issue the request?  What if some of the files below this directory
are not owned by the user issuing the request?

> On 2013/12/17 1:45, Cong Wang wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Li Wang <liwang@...ntukylin.com> wrote:
>>> This patch extend the 'drop_caches' interface to
>>> support directory level cache cleaning and has a complete
>>> backward compatibility. '{1,2,3}' keeps the same semantics
>>> as before. Besides, "{1,2,3}:DIRECTORY_PATH_NAME" is allowed
>>> to recursively clean the caches under DIRECTORY_PATH_NAME.
>>> For example, 'echo 1:/home/foo/jpg > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches'
>>> will clean the page caches of the files inside 'home/foo/jpg'.
>>>
>>
>> This interface is ugly...
>>
>> And we already have a file-level drop cache, that is,
>> fadvise(DONTNEED). Can you extend it if it can't
>> handle a directory fd?
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-- 
Matthew Wilcox				Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists