linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/05 v2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: r7s72100 base support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131218100553.GB3314@katana>
Date:	Wed, 18 Dec 2013 11:05:53 +0100
From:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	SH-Linux <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Simon Horman [Horms]" <horms@...ge.net.au>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/05 v2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: r7s72100 base support


> >> +#define _P_DATA(bank, pin, name, sfx)                                        \
> >> +     PINMUX_DATA(name##_DATA, name##_PMC_0, name##_PIPC_0,           \
> >> +                 name##_PIBC_1, name##_PBDC_1)
> >> +
> >> +#define _P_FN(n, fn, pfcae, pfce, pfc)                                       \
> >> +     PINMUX_DATA(n##_MARK_FN##fn, n##_PMC_1, n##_PIPC_1,             \
> >> +                 n##_PFCAE_##pfcae, n##_PFCE_##pfce, n##_PFC_##pfc)
> >
> > I need to apply this patch, otherwise my i2c pinmuxing fails?
> 
> Thanks. It looks to me like the _P_FN() bits would be mainly needed.
> Can you try to omit the _P_DATA() portion and check if it is still
> behaving as expected?

Nope, doesn't work.


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)