[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131218114633.GR3694@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 12:46:33 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] rcu: Exclude all potential timekeepers from
sysidle detection
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:43:18PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:49:15AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > That's to start simple as CPU 0 can't be offlined.
>
> Yes it can, see CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_HOTPLUG_CPU0
Also, that's a traditional weirdness of x86. Other archs might not have
this constraint at all and can hotplug any cpu.
So relying on the fact that cpu 0 cannot be hotplugged is broken.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists