linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] Use lockless lists for smp_call_function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131218153644.GA16049@infradead.org>
Date:	Wed, 18 Dec 2013 07:36:44 -0800
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Use lockless lists for smp_call_function_single()

On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 04:24:59PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
>   Hello,
> 
>   these three patches make smp_call_function_single() use lockless lists and
> cleanup abuse of csd.list in the block layer. I have some use for lockless
> smp_call_function_single() in printk code and that's why I've picked up
> Christoph's patch. Jens, can you have a look at the series please?

seconded.  Also I think your two cleanups should go before my patch.
I'll also dust up my other patch to use __smp_call_function_single
directly in the block layer once we make progress on these.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/