[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131218235504.GA17958@yabbi.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 09:55:04 +1000
From: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@...-t.net>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...il.com>,
Antonio Ospite <ospite@...denti.unina.it>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, input-tools@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Input: introduce ABS_MAX2/CNT2 and friends
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 03:48:37PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Thursday, December 19, 2013 09:40:09 AM Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > > + memset(&abs, 0, sizeof(abs));
> > > + for (i = valid_cnt; i < cnt; ++i)
> > > + if (copy_to_user(&pinfo->info[i], &abs, sizeof(abs)))
> > > + return -EFAULT;
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> >
> > why don't you return the number of valid copied axes to the user?
> > that seems better even than forcing the remainder to 0.
>
> Well, if your program messed up buffers that it faulted we do not know
> for sure if data that did not cause fault ended up where it should have
> or if it smashed something else. This condition I think should be
> signaled early.
not 100% sure I understand but I wasn't proposing to remove the -EFAULT, i
was proposing to replace "return 0" with "return valid_cnt".
Cheers,
Peter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists