linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] clocksource/cadence_ttc: Store timer frequency in driver data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:32:44 -0800
From:	Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
To:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
CC:	Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] clocksource/cadence_ttc: Store timer frequency in
 driver data

Hi Daniel,

On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 10:58:26PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 12/18/2013 05:47 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> >Hi Daniel,
> >
> >On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 03:53:51PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >>On 12/17/2013 08:21 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> >>>Hi Daniel,
> >>>
> >>>On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 05:04:50PM -0800, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
> >>>>It is not allowed to call clk_get_rate() from interrupt context. To
> >>>>avoid such calls the timer input frequency is stored in the driver's
> >>>>data struct which makes it accessible to the driver in any context.
> >>>>
> >>>>Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
> >>>>Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> >>>
> >>>I doubt that we'll resolve all issues with this series before the
> >>>holidays or even the next merge window. Could you take this patch into
> >>>your tree for 3.14? It is not directly related to the cpufreq work and
> >>>fixes an actual issue that triggers a kernel WARN under some condition
> >>>(I missed preserving the details and the trace). That would take the
> >>>easy stuff out of the way and we can focus on the more controversial
> >>>changes.
> >>
> >>You are asking to take it for 3.14 but shouldn't it go as a 3.13 fix ?
> >
> >That's also an option. As I remember, the patch fixes a kernel WARN. The
> >system still seemed operational though. Up to you whether this is
> >considered severe enough for the 3.13 series. I'm happy either way.
> 
> I was not able to reproduce the WARN with my board.
> 
> Please, could you give the WARN or give the procedure to reproduce it ?

I can't either... I thought I saw the WARN on a vanilla kernel during
boot (IIRC, when cpuidle started). Is there any chance the timer core
calls the timer's set_mode() from interrupt context?
Anyway, let's drop it for now. I'll make sure to record more information
in case it reappears.

	Sören


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/