[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52B34454.1040603@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:09:08 -0700
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86: sysfb: remove sysfb when probing real hw
On 12/19/2013 11:55 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org> wrote:
>
>> On 12/19/2013 03:13 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
>>> With CONFIG_X86_SYSFB=y, probing real hw-drivers may result in
>>> resource-conflicts and drivers will refuse to load. A call to
>>> request_mem_region() will fail, if the region overlaps with the mem-region
>>> used by simplefb. The common desktop DRM drivers (intel, nouveau, radeon)
>>> are not affected as they don't reserve their resources, but some others
>>> do, including (nvidiafb, cirrus, ..).
>>
>> I have validated that this doesn't cause any regressions on the/a
>> non-x86 platform using simplefb, although given the main point of this
>> patch is to fix issues on x86, I'm rather hesitant to give a tested-by
>> tag in case someone looking back interprets it incorrectly:-)
>
> Tested-on-ARM-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
I suppose with CC: stable there's some precedent for a comment after the
tag, so perhaps:
Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org> # on ARM only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists