[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52B34A0F.5080901@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:33:35 -0700
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Bill Huang <bilhuang@...dia.com>, rjw@...ysocki.net,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, thierry.reding@...il.com
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] cpufreq: tegra: Re-model Tegra20 cpufreq driver
On 12/19/2013 04:18 AM, Bill Huang wrote:
> Re-model Tegra20 cpufreq driver as below.
>
> * Rename tegra-cpufreq.c to tegra20-cpufreq.c since this file supports
> only Tegra20.
> * Add probe function so defer probe can be used when we're going to
> support DVFS.
> * Create a fake cpufreq platform device with its name being
> "${root_compatible}-cpufreq" so SoC cpufreq driver can bind to it
> accordingly.
Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
It should be fine to merge the arch/arm/mach-tegra/ changes in this
patch through the cpufreq tree, since I don't think they'll conflict at
all with anything in other trees this kernel cycle.
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c
> -#define NUM_CPUS 2
> +#define MAX_CPUS 2
Nit: Given this driver is explicitly for a 2-CPU SoC, I don't think
there's any need to s/NUM/MAX/ here. But I don't care that much.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists