[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFy5zg_cJueMZFzuqr06rT-hwnHhvBpM6W9657sxnCzxKg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 05:02:20 +0900
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: bad page state in 3.13-rc4
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org> wrote:
>
> Yes, that's what I found when I started looking into this in detail again.
> I think the page reference counting is actually correct. There are 2
> references on each page: the first is from the find_or_create_page() call,
> and the second is from the get_user_pages() (which also makes sure the page
> is populated into the page tables).
Ok, I'm sorry, but that's just pure bullshit then.
So it has the page array in the page cache, then mmap's it in, and
uses get_user_pages() to get the pages back that it *just* created.
This code is pure and utter garbage. It's beyond the pale how crazy it is.
Why not just get rid of the idiotic get_user_pages() crap then?
Something like the attached patch?
Totally untested, but at least it makes *some* amount of sense.
Linus
View attachment "patch.diff" of type "text/plain" (1655 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists