[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52B35369.6070208@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:13:29 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, peterz@...radead.org, rui.zhang@...el.com,
bitbucket@...ine.de, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, lenb@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com,
hpa@...ux.intel.com, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/idle] x86, acpi, idle: Restructure the mwait idle routines
On 12/19/2013 12:09 PM, tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c b/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
> index 8f181b3..e8275f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
> @@ -438,9 +438,7 @@ static int clamp_thread(void *arg)
> */
> local_touch_nmi();
> stop_critical_timings();
> - __monitor((void *)¤t_thread_info()->flags, 0, 0);
> - cpu_relax(); /* allow HT sibling to run */
> - __mwait(eax, ecx);
> + mwait_idle_with_hints(eax, ecx);
> start_critical_timings();
> atomic_inc(&idle_wakeup_counter);
> }
>
Should this cpu_relax() be in the common code as well?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists