| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <52B28E69.3030703@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 11:42:57 +0530
From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
CC: <rydberg@...omail.se>, <jcbian@...cir.com.cn>,
<linux-input@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] Input: pixcir_i2c_ts: Add device tree support
On 12/18/2013 07:39 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 02:51:12PM +0530, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> Provide device tree support and binding information.
>> Change platform data parameters from x/y_max to x/y_size..
>
> I'd rather keep them as they were.
OK.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
>> Acked-by: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@...com>
>> ---
>> .../bindings/input/touchscreen/pixcir_i2c_ts.txt | 26 ++++++++
>> drivers/input/touchscreen/pixcir_i2c_ts.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++--
>> include/linux/input/pixcir_ts.h | 5 +-
>> 3 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/pixcir_i2c_ts.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/pixcir_i2c_ts.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/pixcir_i2c_ts.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..c0b0b270
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/pixcir_i2c_ts.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
>> +* Pixcir I2C touchscreen controllers
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +- compatible: must be "pixcir,pixcir_ts"
>> +- reg: I2C address of the chip
>> +- interrupts: interrupt to which the chip is connected
>> +- attb-gpio: GPIO connected to the ATTB line of the chip
>> +- x-size: horizontal resolution of touchscreen
>> +- y-size: vertical resolution of touchscreen
>> +
>> +Example:
>> +
>> + i2c@...00000 {
>> + /* ... */
>> +
>> + pixcir_ts@5c {
>> + compatible = "pixcir,pixcir_ts";
>> + reg = <0x5c>;
>> + interrupts = <2 0>;
>> + attb-gpio = <&gpf 2 0 2>;
>> + x-size = <800>;
>> + y-size = <600>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + /* ... */
>> + };
>> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/pixcir_i2c_ts.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/pixcir_i2c_ts.c
>> index 6cc6b36..3a447c9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/pixcir_i2c_ts.c
>> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/pixcir_i2c_ts.c
>> @@ -24,6 +24,10 @@
>> #include <linux/i2c.h>
>> #include <linux/input.h>
>> #include <linux/input/pixcir_ts.h>
>> +#include <linux/gpio.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>>
>> struct pixcir_i2c_ts_data {
>> struct i2c_client *client;
>> @@ -125,15 +129,65 @@ static int pixcir_i2c_ts_resume(struct device *dev)
>> static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(pixcir_dev_pm_ops,
>> pixcir_i2c_ts_suspend, pixcir_i2c_ts_resume);
>>
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_OF)
>
> #ifdef is preferred for simple conditions.
>
>> +static const struct of_device_id pixcir_of_match[];
>> +
>> +static struct pixcir_ts_platform_data *pixcir_parse_dt(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct pixcir_ts_platform_data *pdata;
>> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>> + const struct of_device_id *match;
>> +
>> + match = of_match_device(of_match_ptr(pixcir_of_match), dev);
>> + if (!match)
>> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
> Why do you need an explicit match here?
>
Right, it is not needed here for this patch but used later in patch 6
to get chip specific data. I'll fix this while re-arranging the patches.
>> +
>> + pdata = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!pdata)
>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> +
>> + pdata->gpio_attb = of_get_named_gpio(np, "attb-gpio", 0);
>> + if (!gpio_is_valid(pdata->gpio_attb))
>> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get ATTB GPIO\n");
>> +
>> + if (of_property_read_u32(np, "x-size", &pdata->x_size)) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get x-size property\n");
>> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (of_property_read_u32(np, "y-size", &pdata->y_size)) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get y-size property\n");
>> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>> + }
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(dev, "%s: x %d, y %d, gpio %d\n", __func__,
>> + pdata->x_size, pdata->y_size, pdata->gpio_attb);
>> +
>> + return pdata;
>> +}
>> +#else
>> +static struct pixcir_ts_platform_data *pixcir_parse_dt(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + return NULL;
>
> This should be
>
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
> since you test it with IS_ERR() later.
OK.
>
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>> static int pixcir_i2c_ts_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>> {
>> const struct pixcir_ts_platform_data *pdata = client->dev.platform_data;
>> + struct device *dev = &client->dev;
>> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>> struct pixcir_i2c_ts_data *tsdata;
>> struct input_dev *input;
>> int error;
>>
>> - if (!pdata) {
>> + if (np) {
>> + pdata = pixcir_parse_dt(dev);
>> + if (IS_ERR(pdata))
>> + return PTR_ERR(pdata);
>
> We should be favoring kernel-provided platform data if it is pesent even
> if there is dt-data available. This way user can override firmware,m if
> needed.
>
OK. But how can the user override kernel provided platform data? Can't device
tree overlays be used to patch DT data in the same fashion.
I've not tried either so I don't know which one is more user friendly.
>> +
>> + } else if (!pdata) {
>> dev_err(&client->dev, "platform data not defined\n");
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> @@ -157,10 +211,14 @@ static int pixcir_i2c_ts_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> __set_bit(EV_KEY, input->evbit);
>> __set_bit(EV_ABS, input->evbit);
>> __set_bit(BTN_TOUCH, input->keybit);
>> - input_set_abs_params(input, ABS_X, 0, pdata->x_max, 0, 0);
>> - input_set_abs_params(input, ABS_Y, 0, pdata->y_max, 0, 0);
>> - input_set_abs_params(input, ABS_MT_POSITION_X, 0, pdata->x_max, 0, 0);
>> - input_set_abs_params(input, ABS_MT_POSITION_Y, 0, pdata->y_max, 0, 0);
>> + input_set_abs_params(input, ABS_X,
>> + 0, pdata->x_size - 1, 0, 0);
>> + input_set_abs_params(input, ABS_Y,
>> + 0, pdata->y_size - 1, 0, 0);
>> + input_set_abs_params(input, ABS_MT_POSITION_X,
>> + 0, pdata->x_size - 1, 0, 0);
>> + input_set_abs_params(input, ABS_MT_POSITION_Y,
>> + 0, pdata->y_size - 1, 0, 0);
>>
>> input_set_drvdata(input, tsdata);
>>
>> @@ -211,11 +269,20 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id pixcir_i2c_ts_id[] = {
>> };
>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, pixcir_i2c_ts_id);
>>
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_OF)
>> +static const struct of_device_id pixcir_of_match[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "pixcir,pixcir_ts", },
>> + { }
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, pixcir_of_match);
>> +#endif
>
> #ifdef is preferred for simple conditions.
>
OK.
>> +
>> static struct i2c_driver pixcir_i2c_ts_driver = {
>> .driver = {
>> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> .name = "pixcir_ts",
>> .pm = &pixcir_dev_pm_ops,
>> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(pixcir_of_match),
>> },
>> .probe = pixcir_i2c_ts_probe,
>> .remove = pixcir_i2c_ts_remove,
>> diff --git a/include/linux/input/pixcir_ts.h b/include/linux/input/pixcir_ts.h
>> index 7163d91..b34ff7e 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/input/pixcir_ts.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/input/pixcir_ts.h
>> @@ -3,8 +3,9 @@
>>
>> struct pixcir_ts_platform_data {
>> int (*attb_read_val)(void);
>> - int x_max;
>> - int y_max;
>> + unsigned int x_size; /* X axis resolution */
>> + unsigned int y_size; /* Y axis resolution */
>> + int gpio_attb; /* GPIO connected to ATTB line */
>> };
>
> OK, it looks like the series were split awkwardly: you are defining data
> that is used by follow-up patches and its purpose is unclear when
> reviewing patch-by-patch. I'd recommend rearranging so that DT support
> patch is the very last in the series.
>
Got it.
>>
>> #endif
>> --
>> 1.8.3.2
cheers,
-roger
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists