lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ob4c1nwf.fsf@natisbad.org>
Date:	Thu, 19 Dec 2013 23:22:56 +0100
From:	arno@...isbad.org (Arnaud Ebalard)
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	rtc-linux@...glegroups.com,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Peter Huewe <peter.huewe@...ineon.com>,
	Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7] rtc: Add support for Intersil ISL12057 I2C RTC chip

Hi Andrew,

Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:

> On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 22:53:16 +0100 Arnaud Ebalard <arno@...isbad.org> wrote:
>
>> +static int isl12057_i2c_validate_chip(struct regmap *regmap)
>> +{
>> +	u8 regs[ISL12057_MEM_MAP_LEN];
>> +	u8 mask[ISL12057_MEM_MAP_LEN] = { 0x80, 0x80, 0x80, 0xf8,
>> +					  0xc0, 0x60, 0x00, 0x00,
>> +					  0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
>> +					  0x00, 0x00, 0x60, 0x7c };
>> +	int ret, i;
>> +
>> +	ret = regmap_bulk_read(regmap, 0, regs, ISL12057_MEM_MAP_LEN);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < ISL12057_MEM_MAP_LEN; ++i) {
>> +		if (regs[i] & mask[i])	/* check if bits are cleared */
>> +			return -ENODEV;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>
> When I build this for x86_64, mask[] is assembled on-stack at runtime:
>
> 	leaq	-48(%rbp), %r14	#, tmp130
> 	xorl	%esi, %esi	#
> 	movl	$16, %ecx	#,
> 	movq	%rax, %rdi	# regmap,
> 	incq	.LPBX1+552(%rip)	# *.LPBX1
> 	movb	$-128, -64(%rbp)	#, mask
> 	movq	%r14, %rdx	# tmp130,
> 	movb	$-128, -63(%rbp)	#, mask
> 	movb	$-128, -62(%rbp)	#, mask
> 	movb	$-8, -61(%rbp)	#, mask
> 	movb	$-64, -60(%rbp)	#, mask
> 	movb	$96, -59(%rbp)	#, mask
> 	movb	$0, -58(%rbp)	#, mask
> 	movb	$0, -57(%rbp)	#, mask
> 	movb	$0, -56(%rbp)	#, mask
> 	movb	$0, -55(%rbp)	#, mask
> 	movb	$0, -54(%rbp)	#, mask
> 	movb	$0, -53(%rbp)	#, mask
> 	movb	$0, -52(%rbp)	#, mask
> 	movb	$0, -51(%rbp)	#, mask
> 	movb	$96, -50(%rbp)	#, mask
> 	movb	$124, -49(%rbp)	#, mask
> 	call	regmap_bulk_read	#
>
> If we make `mask' static const, that all gets done at compile time instead:
>
> 	leaq	-48(%rbp), %r14	#, tmp134
> 	xorl	%esi, %esi	#
> 	movl	$16, %ecx	#,
> 	movq	%rax, %rdi	# regmap,
> 	incq	.LPBX1+552(%rip)	# *.LPBX1
> 	movq	%r14, %rdx	# tmp134,
> 	call	regmap_bulk_read	#
>
> much nicer.

Damned. That's a good argument for a v8 ;-) Give me some minutes to
assemble one.

Cheers,

a+
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ