linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: tegra: fix missing pincontrol configuration for Venice2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:44:24 +0530
From:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	"thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>
CC:	"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
	"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: tegra: fix missing pincontrol configuration
 for Venice2

On Thursday 19 December 2013 02:26 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 12/18/2013 05:52 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>> Compare the initial population of default pinmux configuration of Venice2
>> with the chrome branch and add/fix the missing configurations.
> Wow, that's a big chunk of changes. Are you sure this is correct? Why
> was the original patch (which added the pinctrl nodes) so incorrect?

The pinmux which got added is based on the venice2 pinmux spreadsheet 
where I covered only the SFIO pin groups.

https://wiki.nvidia.com/engwiki/index.php/Platform_Design_Center/Projects_Archive/PM371#pinmux


After comparing with the chrome, I also added the pinmux for all pins 
which are used as GPIO and hence the change is big.
This is complete pinmux based on chrome kernel-next.
I booted chrome with this pinmux and not observe any behavioral change.

> Thierry, I thought you had mentioned comparing the pinctrl setup in
> linux-next with the downstream kernel for Venice2 and only found a
> difference in the PWM settings, which you sent a patch for. However,
> this patch is much larger than that. Where's the disconnect?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/