lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87haa5fgs1.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date:	Thu, 19 Dec 2013 16:20:46 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@...g.com.ar>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCHSET 00/18] perf report: Add support to accumulate hist periods (v3)

On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 14:47:15 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:37:49PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
>> 2013-12-18 (수), 10:46 +0100, Ingo Molnar:
>> > * Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> > > I changed the option as a separate --cumulate and added a new
>> > > "Total" column (and renamed the default "Overhead" column into
>> > > "Self").  The output will be sorted by total (cumulative) overhead
>> > > for now.  The reason I changed to the --cumulate is that I still
>> > > think it's much different from other --callchain options and I
>> > > plan to add support for showing (remaining) callchains to
>> > > cumulative entries too.  The --callchain option will take care of
>> > > it even with --cumulate option.
>
>> > So I still think this is a fantastic feature, and while this variant 
>> > of the user interface is an improvement over the previous version, we 
>> > are not there yet ;-)
>> 
>> Right.  But I want to finish the core part of this patchset first.  And
>> then I will work on the UI part since it'll be a quite large work by
>> itself, I guess.
>
> I got the first few ones, that are not really related to this, to reduce
> the patchkit size, will go thru the others next.

Right.  I missed to mention that they're independent cleanups, thanks.

>  
>> > So the natural way to get this would something like:
>> > 
>> > 	perf report --total
>> > 
>> > Or, if '--total' does not feel good, maybe we should change 'Total' to 
>> > 'Siblings' or 'Children', and propagate that naming through the UI:
>> 
>> Childrend looks better to me.
>
> --children, ack

Okay.

Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ