linux-kernel - Re: am335x: IIO/ADC fixes if used together with TSC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 19 Dec 2013 08:48:47 +0000
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Zubair Lutfullah <zubair.lutfullah@...il.com>,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: am335x: IIO/ADC fixes if used together with TSC

> >> Given timing I suspect that by the we have reviewed these will be too
> >late in this cycle so will hit in the merge window plus stable.
> >> 
> >> Also some of these are cleanups rather than fixes so should normally
> >be separate from fixes and applied after them as they are not 
> >> Stable material.
> >
> >I tried to keep 5/5 as small as possible so I factor individual and
> >separate changes as good as possible as long as the drivers remained
> >functional. That means 1-4 are mostly pre-work for 5/5 and that makes
> >5/5 depends on them.
> >
> >Tagging 5/5 stable I would prefer to take 1-4, too to keep the backport
> >effort small. The clash due to the continues mode which is v3.13 is
> >probably small. This said, I think it is the best to backport it stable
> >if someone asks for it (unless the majority here thinks otherwise).
> >
> >Are you saying this is too late for v3.13 or v3.14-rc1?
> >
> >Sebastian
> 
> Too late for 3.13. Probably fine for next merge window if reviews are all good or as a
>  fix post 3.14-rc1 of it misses the cutoff for the merge window.

I think this set should go in via -next. So it will hit the v3.14
merge window.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/