[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1312191058100.28730@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:59:03 +0100 (CET)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
cc: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>, thomas@...3r.de,
list@...osl.org, Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, open@...osl.org,
HID CORE LAYER <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
"driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org"
<devel@...uxdriverproject.org>
Subject: Re: [v3.11][Regression] HID: hyperv: convert alloc+memcpy to
memdup
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013, David Herrmann wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> > index 253fe23..81eacd3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> > @@ -1334,7 +1334,7 @@ int hid_report_raw_event(struct hid_device *hid, int type, u8 *data, int size,
> > csize--;
> > }
> >
> > - rsize = ((report->size - 1) >> 3) + 1;
> > + rsize = ((report->size - 1) >> 3) + 1 + (report->id > 0) + 7;
>
> Isn't "report->id" already covered by "if (report_enum->numbered)"
> above? The test for "id > 0" won't work here as in this case
> "report_enum->numbered" must already be set to true by the hid-desc
> parser, doesn't it?
Right, that one is not correct here, thanks.
> Where exactly did you get the +7 from?
Please see commit (the one I am not really proud of) 27ce405039bfe6d3.
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists