linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v0 04/71] itrace: Infrastructure for instruction flow tracing units

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:25:19 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v0 04/71] itrace: Infrastructure for instruction flow
 tracing units

On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 01:14:09PM +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:
> 
> > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 09:53:44AM +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> >> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:
> >> > The thing is; why can't you zero-copy whatever buffer the hardware
> >> > writes into, into the normal buffer?
> >> 
> >> I'm not sure I understand. You mean, have the buffer split between perf
> >> data and trace data?
> >
> > Yep, I don't see any reason why this wouldn't work.
> >
> > When the hardware thing sends an interrupt to notify us its buffer is
> > 'full', stop the recorder, try to create a single record in the buffer
> > that's big enough + 1 page, then swizzle the hardware pages and the
> > buffer pages for that record, using the +1 page to page align the actual
> > data. Then (re)start the hardware on the 'new' pages.
> 
> We configure the hardware thing to send an interrupt *before* the buffer
> is full, keep the recorder running while userspace saves stuff to
> perf.data file. Recording only stops if perf fails to read the trace
> data out fast enough and the buffer fills up. So you'd have a complete
> trace.
> 
> Also, we have what we call a "snapshot" mode, where we keep the hardware
> thing running, writing data to a circular buffer till it's stopped, in
> case we're only interested in the most recent trace data to see what it
> is that takes too long to respond, etc. And while it is running, we're
> getting new records in the perf stream all the time (mmaps, etc).
> 
> Put simple: perf data and trace data are two different separate types of
> information that originate from two different sources, can exist and
> make sense separately from one another and should not be mixed.

Well you're either having to change your stance or we're done talking
right now.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/