| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1387454106-19326-200-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 11:54:57 +0000
From: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>,
Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.11 199/208] selinux: handle TCP SYN-ACK packets correctly in selinux_ip_postroute()
3.11.10.2 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>
commit 446b802437f285de68ffb8d6fac3c44c3cab5b04 upstream.
In selinux_ip_postroute() we perform access checks based on the
packet's security label. For locally generated traffic we get the
packet's security label from the associated socket; this works in all
cases except for TCP SYN-ACK packets. In the case of SYN-ACK packet's
the correct security label is stored in the connection's request_sock,
not the server's socket. Unfortunately, at the point in time when
selinux_ip_postroute() is called we can't query the request_sock
directly, we need to recreate the label using the same logic that
originally labeled the associated request_sock.
See the inline comments for more explanation.
Reported-by: Janak Desai <Janak.Desai@...i.gatech.edu>
Tested-by: Janak Desai <Janak.Desai@...i.gatech.edu>
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
---
security/selinux/hooks.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
index 01ba0d6..dc3aa33 100644
--- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
+++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@ -3812,6 +3812,30 @@ static int selinux_skb_peerlbl_sid(struct sk_buff *skb, u16 family, u32 *sid)
return 0;
}
+/**
+ * selinux_conn_sid - Determine the child socket label for a connection
+ * @sk_sid: the parent socket's SID
+ * @skb_sid: the packet's SID
+ * @conn_sid: the resulting connection SID
+ *
+ * If @skb_sid is valid then the user:role:type information from @sk_sid is
+ * combined with the MLS information from @skb_sid in order to create
+ * @conn_sid. If @skb_sid is not valid then then @conn_sid is simply a copy
+ * of @sk_sid. Returns zero on success, negative values on failure.
+ *
+ */
+static int selinux_conn_sid(u32 sk_sid, u32 skb_sid, u32 *conn_sid)
+{
+ int err = 0;
+
+ if (skb_sid != SECSID_NULL)
+ err = security_sid_mls_copy(sk_sid, skb_sid, conn_sid);
+ else
+ *conn_sid = sk_sid;
+
+ return err;
+}
+
/* socket security operations */
static int socket_sockcreate_sid(const struct task_security_struct *tsec,
@@ -4418,7 +4442,7 @@ static int selinux_inet_conn_request(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct sk_security_struct *sksec = sk->sk_security;
int err;
u16 family = sk->sk_family;
- u32 newsid;
+ u32 connsid;
u32 peersid;
/* handle mapped IPv4 packets arriving via IPv6 sockets */
@@ -4428,16 +4452,11 @@ static int selinux_inet_conn_request(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
err = selinux_skb_peerlbl_sid(skb, family, &peersid);
if (err)
return err;
- if (peersid == SECSID_NULL) {
- req->secid = sksec->sid;
- req->peer_secid = SECSID_NULL;
- } else {
- err = security_sid_mls_copy(sksec->sid, peersid, &newsid);
- if (err)
- return err;
- req->secid = newsid;
- req->peer_secid = peersid;
- }
+ err = selinux_conn_sid(sksec->sid, peersid, &connsid);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ req->secid = connsid;
+ req->peer_secid = peersid;
return selinux_netlbl_inet_conn_request(req, family);
}
@@ -4811,12 +4830,12 @@ static unsigned int selinux_ip_postroute(struct sk_buff *skb, int ifindex,
if (!secmark_active && !peerlbl_active)
return NF_ACCEPT;
- /* if the packet is being forwarded then get the peer label from the
- * packet itself; otherwise check to see if it is from a local
- * application or the kernel, if from an application get the peer label
- * from the sending socket, otherwise use the kernel's sid */
sk = skb->sk;
if (sk == NULL) {
+ /* Without an associated socket the packet is either coming
+ * from the kernel or it is being forwarded; check the packet
+ * to determine which and if the packet is being forwarded
+ * query the packet directly to determine the security label. */
if (skb->skb_iif) {
secmark_perm = PACKET__FORWARD_OUT;
if (selinux_skb_peerlbl_sid(skb, family, &peer_sid))
@@ -4825,7 +4844,26 @@ static unsigned int selinux_ip_postroute(struct sk_buff *skb, int ifindex,
secmark_perm = PACKET__SEND;
peer_sid = SECINITSID_KERNEL;
}
+ } else if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
+ /* Locally generated packet but the associated socket is in the
+ * listening state which means this is a SYN-ACK packet. In
+ * this particular case the correct security label is assigned
+ * to the connection/request_sock but unfortunately we can't
+ * query the request_sock as it isn't queued on the parent
+ * socket until after the SYN-ACK packet is sent; the only
+ * viable choice is to regenerate the label like we do in
+ * selinux_inet_conn_request(). See also selinux_ip_output()
+ * for similar problems. */
+ u32 skb_sid;
+ struct sk_security_struct *sksec = sk->sk_security;
+ if (selinux_skb_peerlbl_sid(skb, family, &skb_sid))
+ return NF_DROP;
+ if (selinux_conn_sid(sksec->sid, skb_sid, &peer_sid))
+ return NF_DROP;
+ secmark_perm = PACKET__SEND;
} else {
+ /* Locally generated packet, fetch the security label from the
+ * associated socket. */
struct sk_security_struct *sksec = sk->sk_security;
peer_sid = sksec->sid;
secmark_perm = PACKET__SEND;
--
1.8.3.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists