[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131219123137.GC18110@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 13:31:37 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
Cc: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
"linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: cirrusdrmfb broken with simplefb
* David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 1:03 AM, One Thousand Gnomes
> <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> >> > That bug always existed, simplefb is just the first driver to hit it
> >> > (vesafb/efifb didn't use resources). I'm aware of the issue but as a
> >> > workaround you can simply disable CONFIG_X86_SYSFB. That restores
> >> > the old behavior.
> >>
> >> This looks like a regression, so we'll either need a fix or we'll have
> >> to mark CONFIG_X86_SYSFB as CONFIG_BROKEN.
> >
> > Kernel bugzilla has entries for simplefb breaking both vesafb and
> > matrox mga.
>
> Thanks for the hints. I've read through all I could find and tried
> to provide some help.
>
> I'm kind of confused, most of them enable CONFIG_X86_SYSFB (which is
> 'n' by default) but don't read the help text. I did my best to tell
> people that this option requires CONFIG_FB_SIMPLE, but if you don't
> read the help-text you won't notice that. Don't know what to do
> about that..
People generally don't read the help text - still the kernel should
not break. So please the Kconfig angle (and the bootup logic, etc.)
fool-proof, graphics failures are not fun to debug!
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists