linux-kernel - [Patch v2 05/13] PCI, pci-label: treat PCI label with index 0 as valid label

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1387456702-4709-6-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 19 Dec 2013 20:38:14 +0800
From:	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
To:	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc:	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Patch v2 05/13] PCI, pci-label: treat PCI label with index 0 as valid label

Current pci-label driver detects ACPI label by checking label index
returned by ACPI _DSM method, and treat it as valid if label index
is positive. According to ACPI Firmware specification 3.1, zero is
also an valid label index. So change code to detect availability of
ACPI slot label by checking availaiblity of ACPI _DSM function for
PCI label.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/pci/pci-label.c |   34 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-label.c b/drivers/pci/pci-label.c
index f12dcd1..0260b14 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci-label.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci-label.c
@@ -187,7 +187,6 @@ static const char device_label_dsm_uuid[] = {
 };
 
 enum acpi_attr_enum {
-	ACPI_ATTR_NONE = 0,
 	ACPI_ATTR_LABEL_SHOW,
 	ACPI_ATTR_INDEX_SHOW,
 };
@@ -222,20 +221,16 @@ dsm_get_label(struct device *dev, char *buf, enum acpi_attr_enum attr)
 	if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE && obj->package.count == 2 &&
 	    tmp[0].type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER &&
 	    tmp[1].type == ACPI_TYPE_STRING) {
-		len = tmp[0].integer.value;
-		if (buf) {
-			/*
-			 * This second string element is optional even when
-			 * this _DSM is implemented; when not implemented,
-			 * this entry must return a null string.
-			 */
-			if (attr == ACPI_ATTR_INDEX_SHOW)
-				scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%llu\n",
-				tmp->integer.value);
-			else if (attr == ACPI_ATTR_LABEL_SHOW)
-				dsm_label_utf16s_to_utf8s(tmp + 1, buf);
-			len = strlen(buf) > 0 ? strlen(buf) : -1;
-		}
+		/*
+		 * The second string element is optional even when
+		 * this _DSM is implemented; when not implemented,
+		 * this entry must return a null string.
+		 */
+		if (attr == ACPI_ATTR_INDEX_SHOW)
+			scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%llu\n", tmp->integer.value);
+		else if (attr == ACPI_ATTR_LABEL_SHOW)
+			dsm_label_utf16s_to_utf8s(tmp + 1, buf);
+		len = strlen(buf) > 0 ? strlen(buf) : -1;
 	}
 
 	ACPI_FREE(obj);
@@ -246,7 +241,14 @@ dsm_get_label(struct device *dev, char *buf, enum acpi_attr_enum attr)
 static bool
 device_has_dsm(struct device *dev)
 {
-	return dsm_get_label(dev, NULL, ACPI_ATTR_NONE) > 0;
+	acpi_handle handle;
+
+	handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
+	if (!handle)
+		return false;
+
+	return !!acpi_check_dsm(handle, device_label_dsm_uuid, 0x2,
+				1 << DEVICE_LABEL_DSM);
 }
 
 static umode_t
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/