linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/6] perf tools: Get rid of a duplicate va

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131219133213.GL4819@ghostprotocols.net>
Date:	Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:32:13 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] perf tools: Get rid of a duplicate va_end()

Em Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 04:00:08PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
> 
> The va_end() in _eprintf() should be removed since the caller also
> invokes va_end().

Thanks, applied.
 
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/debug.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/debug.c b/tools/perf/util/debug.c
> index 8640a9121e72..299b55586502 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/debug.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/debug.c
> @@ -25,7 +25,6 @@ static int _eprintf(int level, const char *fmt, va_list args)
>  			ui_helpline__vshow(fmt, args);
>  		else
>  			ret = vfprintf(stderr, fmt, args);
> -		va_end(args);
>  	}
>  
>  	return ret;
> -- 
> 1.7.11.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/