[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131219142400.GA13878@ulmo.nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 15:24:02 +0100
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc: Nikita Yushchenko <nyushchenko@....rtsoft.ru>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexey Lugovskoy <lugovskoy@....rtsoft.ru>,
Dmitry Krivoschekov <dkrivoschokov@....rtsoft.ru>
Subject: Re: commit e38c0a1f breaks powerpc boards with uli1575 chip
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:40:21PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> [fixed DT maillist address]
>
> On 12/17/2013 01:35 AM, Nikita Yushchenko wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > While trying to make freescale p2020ds and mpc8572ds boards working with mainline kernel, I faced that commit
> > e38c0a1f (Handle #address-cells > 2 specially) breaks things with these boards.
>
> Good to see this broke in v3.7 and is just now found...
>
> >
> > Both these boards have uli1575 chip.
> > Corresponding part in device tree is something like
> >
> > uli1575@0 {
> > reg = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0>;
> > #size-cells = <2>;
> > #address-cells = <3>;
> > ranges = <0x2000000 0x0 0x80000000
> > 0x2000000 0x0 0x80000000
> > 0x0 0x20000000
> >
> > 0x1000000 0x0 0x0
> > 0x1000000 0x0 0x0
> > 0x0 0x10000>;
> > isa@1e {
> > ...
> >
> > I.e. it has #address-cells = <3>
> >
> >
> > With commit e38c0a1f reverted, devices under uli1575 are registered correctly, e.g. for rtc
> >
> > OF: ** translation for device /pcie@...09000/pcie@...li1575@...sa@...rtc@70 **
> > OF: bus is isa (na=2, ns=1) on /pcie@...09000/pcie@...li1575@...sa@1e
> > OF: translating address: 00000001 00000070
> > OF: parent bus is default (na=3, ns=2) on /pcie@...09000/pcie@...li1575@0
> > OF: walking ranges...
> > OF: ISA map, cp=0, s=1000, da=70
> > OF: parent translation for: 01000000 00000000 00000000
> > OF: with offset: 70
> > OF: one level translation: 00000000 00000000 00000070
> > OF: parent bus is pci (na=3, ns=2) on /pcie@...09000/pcie@0
> > OF: walking ranges...
> > OF: default map, cp=a0000000, s=20000000, da=70
> > OF: default map, cp=0, s=10000, da=70
> > OF: parent translation for: 01000000 00000000 00000000
> > OF: with offset: 70
> > OF: one level translation: 01000000 00000000 00000070
> > OF: parent bus is pci (na=3, ns=2) on /pcie@...09000
> > OF: walking ranges...
> > OF: PCI map, cp=0, s=10000, da=70
> > OF: parent translation for: 01000000 00000000 00000000
> > OF: with offset: 70
> > OF: one level translation: 01000000 00000000 00000070
> > OF: parent bus is default (na=2, ns=2) on /
> > OF: walking ranges...
> > OF: PCI map, cp=0, s=10000, da=70
> > OF: parent translation for: 00000000 ffc10000
> > OF: with offset: 70
> > OF: one level translation: 00000000 ffc10070
> > OF: reached root node
> >
> > With commit e38c0a1f in place, address translation fails:
> >
> > OF: ** translation for device /pcie@...09000/pcie@...li1575@...sa@...rtc@70 **
> > OF: bus is isa (na=2, ns=1) on /pcie@...09000/pcie@...li1575@...sa@1e
> > OF: translating address: 00000001 00000070
> > OF: parent bus is default (na=3, ns=2) on /pcie@...09000/pcie@...li1575@0
> > OF: walking ranges...
> > OF: ISA map, cp=0, s=1000, da=70
> > OF: parent translation for: 01000000 00000000 00000000
> > OF: with offset: 70
> > OF: one level translation: 00000000 00000000 00000070
> > OF: parent bus is pci (na=3, ns=2) on /pcie@...09000/pcie@0
> > OF: walking ranges...
> > OF: default map, cp=a0000000, s=20000000, da=70
> > OF: default map, cp=0, s=10000, da=70
> > OF: not found !
> >
> > Either e38c0a1f should be reverted, or uli1575 (and perhaps other similar devices) have to be described in device
> > trees differently.
>
> Reverting would break Tegra PCIe, but you should not have to change the
> DT either. So we need a solution.
We ended up merging a different address representation for Tegra PCIe
and I've confirmed that reverting this commit doesn't cause any obvious
regressions. I think all other drivers in drivers/pci/host ended up
copying what we did on Tegra, so I wouldn't expect any other breakage
either.
Thierry
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists