[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1312190920340.4238@nuc>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 09:21:15 -0600 (CST)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] re-shrink 'struct page' when SLUB is on.
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 12/18/2013 04:41 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> > Unless somebody can find some holes in this, I think we have no choice
> >> > but to unset the HAVE_ALIGNED_STRUCT_PAGE config option and revert using
> >> > the cmpxchg, at least for now.
> >
> > So your scary patch series which shrinks struct page while retaining
> > the cmpxchg_double() might reclaim most of this loss?
>
> That's what I'll test next, but I hope so.
>
> The config tweak is important because it shows a low-risk way to get a
> small 'struct page', plus get back some performance that we lost and
> evidently never noticed. A distro that was nearing a release might want
> to go with this, for instance.
Ok then lets just drop the cmpxchg updates to the page struct. The
spinlock code is already in there so just removing the __CMPXCHG flag
related processing should do the trick.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists