[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131219172644.7bb5f332@vostro>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 17:26:44 +0200
From: Timo Teras <timo.teras@....fi>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] fs/binfmt_elf: fix memory map for PIE applications
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 16:02:19 +0100 (CET)
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz> wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Dec 2013, Timo Teras wrote:
>
> > As you see, the main executable is mapped 57620000-57708000 and
> > 57708000-5770a000. Heap follow immediately after that
> > 5770a000-5770c000 followed by anything mmaped after it (stack or
> > some other libraries). Heap can grow only up to 5ffdf000 meaning the
> > application is limited to 140 megs or so in this instance. This
> > limit can go much lower depending how the randomization went. And
> > even 140 megs is very little for big apps.
>
> So what is the real problem again (i.e. the actual symptoms), please?
> Is it that your userspace memory allocator doesn't use mmap() for
> allocations at all?
Random application failures with uclibc and musl c-libraries. Both seem
to use mmap() for large allocations, and brk() for small ones. IIRC,
there was also some minor breakage with other applications that use
brk() to do some self-accounting / other funny stuff.
While this is not strictly a bug, I would still hope that the memory
layout is configured for maximum compatibility... or do you see it
introducing unwanted side effects?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists