linux-kernel - Re: Can someone Ack and queue a patch for RTC subsytem?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87sitoka39.fsf@natisbad.org>
Date:	Thu, 19 Dec 2013 18:46:18 +0100
From:	arno@...isbad.org (Arnaud Ebalard)
To:	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
Cc:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Peter Huewe <peter.huewe@...ineon.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: Can someone Ack and queue a patch for RTC subsytem?

Hi,

Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net> writes:

> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 05:34:09PM +0100, Arnaud Ebalard wrote:
>> I have a very simple driver (support for reading and setting the time)
>> for a RTC chip (Intersil ISL 12057) but cannot find anyone to get it
>> Acked and queued for v3.14. In v3.14, there should be at least three
>> users of the driver (ReadyNAS 102, 104 and 2120) if I meet -rc5 cutoff
>> for associated .dts changes.
>
> The -rc5 cutoff isn't a hard line.  It's also mvebu-specific.  eg, We
> need things _posted_ a week or so before arm-soc's cutoff of -rc6 so we
> have time to get the pull request in.  If it needs to go through
> mvebu/arm-soc, once it's posted, you're good.

I understand. But I guess you will not (for valid reason) accept .dts
changes to reference a rtc driver that is not on good track towards
-next. This is the issue I try and solve.


>> I never heard of *listed* RTC maintainer during all the review process
>> on rtc-linux list (v0 sent in october); I dug the list archives and when
>> this previously happened, someone else (e.g. Andrew Morton) was kind
>> enough to handle the patches:
>> 
>>   http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg292187.html
>
> Unfortunately, it doesn't look like Alessandro has been active for a
> while and Andrew Morton has indeed been picking up the slack.  S-o-B's
> confirm this.
>
> I haven't worked with Andrew enough to know his workflow, but I imagine
> he can take patches much closer to the merge window than we can.
>
>> I wonder if someone (Andrew? Stephen? Jason?) would be kind enough to
>> take care of the v6 I just sent [1].
>
> I don't mind routing it though mvebu/arm-soc since the only consumers
> are currently mvebu boards, but I'd like to hear from Andrew that this
> is ok.

I will do what you think is the best.

Cheers,

a+
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/