[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131219175037.GK2480@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 18:50:37 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
x86@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 idle: repair large-server 50-watt idle-power
regression
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 06:25:35PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 06:07:41PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Likewise, having a barrier before the MONITOR looks sensible as well.
>
> I again have to disagree, one would expect monitor to flush all that is
> required to start the monitor -- and it actually does so. As is
> testified by this extra CLFLUSH being called a bug workaround.
SDM states that MONITOR is ordered like a LOAD, and a LOAD cannot pass
a previous STORE to the same address.
That said; there's enough holes in there to swim a titanic through,
seeing how MONITOR stares at an entire cacheline and LOAD/STORE order is
specified on location, whatever that means.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists