linux-kernel - Re: Can someone Ack and queue a patch for RTC subsytem?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131219180940.GY2609@titan.lakedaemon.net>
Date:	Thu, 19 Dec 2013 13:09:40 -0500
From:	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
To:	Arnaud Ebalard <arno@...isbad.org>
Cc:	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	rtc-linux@...glegroups.com,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Peter Huewe <peter.huewe@...ineon.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: Can someone Ack and queue a patch for RTC subsytem?

On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 07:05:49PM +0100, Arnaud Ebalard wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it> writes:
> 
> >> Do you want me to send a v7 w/ the .proc helper removed or leave
> >> things as they are and Ack the patch as is?
> >
> >  Unless absolutely needed, I'd prefer if you can remove them
> >  or move to sysfs.
> 
> Well, my helper provides info on control and status registers flags
> (just like rtc-isl1208.c does), which are useful mainly for debug I
> guess. If this can help pushing things forward, I will send a v7 later
> today w/ the .proc helper removed from the patch.

Why not convert to debugfs?

thx,

Jason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/