[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131219181049.GA6854@roeck-us.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:10:49 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
Cc: Anthony Olech <anthony.olech.opensource@...semi.com>,
lm-sensors@...sensors.org, Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Dajun Chen <david.chen@...semi.com>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH V1] fix adc to voltage calculation in da9052
power driver
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 03:54:54PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Anthony,
>
[ ... ]
>
> BTW, you (and we) probably shouldn't waste too much energy on this.
> ADCs are only accurate to some degree anyway. If you take the
> components connected to the input into consideration, the accuracy gets
> even worse. For example, if the input voltage must be scaled down to
> fit in the ADC's range, you need at least one resistor, which in best
> cases will have a 1% accurate value (known as tolerance.) That's ten
> times the LSB of your 10-bit ADC, at which point / 1023 or / 1024
> really makes no practical difference. Sub-percent tolerant resistors are
> expensive and rare in consumer electronics in my experience.
>
True, but on the other side (and after looking into the datasheet)
the driver already calculated the voltage on adc4..6 correctly,
so unless you disagree I would like to apply the hwmon patch to -next
for consistency.
Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists