[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52B3C5F0.1060303@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 20:22:08 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: joeyli <jlee@...e.com>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>, Elliott@...com,
samer.el-haj-mahmoud@...com, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>,
werner@...e.com, trenn@...e.de, JBeulich@...e.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com,
x86@...nel.org,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/14] Support timezone of ACPI TAD and EFI TIME
On 12/19/2013 08:05 PM, joeyli wrote:
>
> Then that means the priority of PNP0B0x is higher then "CMOS RTC Not
> Present" flag. ACPI spec doesn't have clear definition on this.
>
According to the Microsoft requirements documents, such a platform is
broken and shouldn't exist.
> I look forward to Borislav's "EFI runtime mapping" to fix the physical
> address accessing issue of EFI time service on x86_64 machines. I tested
> his patches on a issue machine and it works for walk around BIOS bug.
>
> Can we use EFI time services on x86_64 after Borislav's patches accepted
> to mainline?
>
No.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists