[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131220084710.GA21133@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 09:47:10 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
hpa@...ux.intel.com, len.brown@...el.com,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/idle] x86, idle: Use static_cpu_has() for CLFLUSH
workaround, add barriers
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 09:40:51PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > + if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSH_MONITOR)) {
> > > + mb();
> > > clflush((void *)¤t_thread_info()->flags);
> > > + mb();
> > > + }
>
> > if (!current_set_polling_and_test()) {
> > if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSH_MONITOR)) {
> > - mb();
> > + /*
> > + * There's no need for an extra barrier here: current_set_polling_and_test()
> > + * already has an smp_mb() after ->flags gets modified, see sched.h.
> > + */
> > clflush((void *)¤t_thread_info()->flags);
> > mb();
> > }
>
> So almost, except that smp_mb() will disappear on an UP kernel whereas
> this errata might just always need the MFENCE.
Yeah. Sigh, so I noticed that and even thought through the UP case and
concluded: on UP the race cannot happen - which is bogus. Yesterday
was so much fail, maybe today's a better day ;-)
Thanks,
ngo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists