[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1811935.VrHgpxyl42@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 14:56:09 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...elcunningham.com.au>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, tomaz.solc@...lix.org,
aaron.lu@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH wq/for-3.14 2/2] workqueue: implement @drain for workqueue_set_max_active()
On Friday, December 20, 2013 08:32:20 AM Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Rafael.
>
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 02:31:37AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > If this looks good to you, I'll commit it to wq/for-3.14 and we can at
> > > least start to clean up things.
> >
> > Yes, it does.
> >
> > So with that I need to do workqueue_set_max_active(wq, WQ_FROZEN_ACTIVE) during
> > suspend and then workqueue_set_max_active(wq, WQ_DFL_ACTIVE) during resume on
> > my workqueue, right?
>
> Yeah, you can also do workqueue_set_max_active(wq, 0) during resume to
> restore the default value, which is what's used by alloc_workqueue()
> anyway.
OK
> I'll apply the two patches to wq/for-3.14 once David reviews them or
> if you wanna take them through the pm tree, that's fine too. I don't
> have anything scheduled for wq for the next merge window.
I have some material queued up, so I can take them once they've been reviewed.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists