[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131220092834.15fa2f6d@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 09:28:34 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, oleg@...hat.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
darren@...art.com, johan.eker@...csson.com, p.faure@...tech.ch,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, claudio@...dence.eu.com,
michael@...rulasolutions.com, fchecconi@...il.com,
tommaso.cucinotta@...up.it, nicola.manica@...i.unitn.it,
luca.abeni@...tn.it, dhaval.giani@...il.com, hgu1972@...il.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, raistlin@...ux.it,
insop.song@...il.com, liming.wang@...driver.com, jkacur@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] sched, deadline: patches
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 14:51:18 +0100
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com> wrote:
> > One question; the SoB chain in patch 2/13 seems weird; I suppose that
> > patch is a collaborative effort? could we cure that by mentioning Fabio
> > and Michael in some other way?
> >
>
> We could change their SoB to be a Cc (not sure this cure the thing anyway). Not
> even Cc-ing them seems pointless. Then we have them mentioned in
> sched/deadline.c copyright (oh! s/2012/2014/ there :-O).
Well, if they were involved in the development of the code, then their
SoB's would be appropriate. That copyright seems to state that they are
required.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists