[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a049daea-a713-4d06-b35f-61f3bec06ba9@email.android.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:29:51 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"samer.el-haj-mahmoud@...com" <samer.el-haj-mahmoud@...com>,
"jlee@...e.com" <jlee@...e.com>, "bp@...e.de" <bp@...e.de>,
"a.zummo@...ertech.it" <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
"Elliott@...com" <Elliott@...com>,
"werner@...e.com" <werner@...e.com>,
"rtc-linux@...glegroups.com" <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"oneukum@...e.de" <oneukum@...e.de>,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
"trenn@...e.de" <trenn@...e.de>,
"JBeulich@...e.com" <JBeulich@...e.com>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"matt@...sole-pimps.org" <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/14] Support timezone of ACPI TAD and EFI TIME
Yes, but the TZ isn't all that critical, either. It certainly doesn't matter at all for a pure Linux system.
Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 08:57 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> But we prefer the TAD for that. The case where the EFI runtime is
>the only source of that info is problematic as they are known to not
>work at runtime. We could collect it at boot and then never change it,
>although you end up in definitional issues between EFI and the hw RTC.
>
>Most shipping UEFI hardware has no TAD.
--
Sent from my mobile phone. Please pardon brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists