lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 13:10:26 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> To: joeyli <jlee@...e.com> CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>, Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>, Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>, Elliott@...com, samer.el-haj-mahmoud@...com, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>, werner@...e.com, trenn@...e.de, JBeulich@...e.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, x86@...nel.org, "linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/14] Support timezone of ACPI TAD and EFI TIME On 12/19/2013 09:38 PM, joeyli wrote: > > If don't use EFI time, then the first priority is using ACPI TAD if it > present. Due to ACPI TAD is a generic acpi device that's need OS parsing > DSDT table before set system time. > > Either move DSDT parser from subsystem initial stage to start_kernel or > move timekeeping initial to after DSDT be parsed. Which one you think is > more possible and risk less? Then I will try that way. > I discussed the DSDT/SSDT parsing issue with Rafael and he claims it would require a lot of restructuring. Unfortunately ACPI is at this point done rather late, as I understand. All of this is a big problem. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists