[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52B4C180.40904@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 14:15:28 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
CC: joeyli <jlee@...e.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>, Elliott@...com,
samer.el-haj-mahmoud@...com, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>,
werner@...e.com, JBeulich@...e.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, x86@...nel.org,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/14] Support timezone of ACPI TAD and EFI TIME
On 12/20/2013 02:53 AM, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> On Thursday, December 19, 2013 08:22:08 PM H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 12/19/2013 08:05 PM, joeyli wrote:
>>> Then that means the priority of PNP0B0x is higher then "CMOS RTC Not
>>> Present" flag. ACPI spec doesn't have clear definition on this.
>>
>> According to the Microsoft requirements documents, such a platform is
>> broken and shouldn't exist.
>
> Is this a public document?
> Probably not but if, a pointer in this thread would help.
> Does Microsoft mention ACPI Time and Alarm Device interface in
> such a document already?
>
This is the document... I can't remember who sent me the link to it:
http://goo.gl/R7S9Mk
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists