[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131220225624.GD22695@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 14:56:24 -0800
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@....com>,
Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@...el.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
janet.morgan@...el.com, tony.luck@...el.com, ruiv.wang@...il.com,
gong.chen@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Add check for number of available vectors before
CPU down [v3]
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:50:09AM -0500, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> I tested across various systems with both the linux.git and linux-next.git
> trees and do not see any false positives. The patch behaves as expected on
> a system with 590 IRQs allocated at boot time; the system refuses to down cpu
> 62.
I read the patch and it looks good to me
I haven't double checked, but I'm assuming the hot plug locks are held
while you are doing this.
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists