lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 21 Dec 2013 19:53:58 +0400
From:	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
To:	<mhocko@...e.cz>
CC:	<glommer@...il.com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	<cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, <devel@...nvz.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 07/11] memcg: get rid of kmem_cache_dup

kmem_cache_dup() is only called from memcg_create_kmem_cache(). The
latter, in fact, does nothing besides this, so let's fold
kmem_cache_dup() into memcg_create_kmem_cache().

This patch also makes the memcg_cache_mutex private to
memcg_create_kmem_cache(), because it is not used anywhere else.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@...il.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c |   39 ++++++++-------------------------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 56fc410..ce25f77 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -3391,27 +3391,16 @@ void mem_cgroup_destroy_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep)
 	schedule_work(&cachep->memcg_params->destroy);
 }
 
-/*
- * This lock protects updaters, not readers. We want readers to be as fast as
- * they can, and they will either see NULL or a valid cache value. Our model
- * allow them to see NULL, in which case the root memcg will be selected.
- *
- * We need this lock because multiple allocations to the same cache from a non
- * will span more than one worker. Only one of them can create the cache.
- */
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(memcg_cache_mutex);
-
-/*
- * Called with memcg_cache_mutex held
- */
-static struct kmem_cache *kmem_cache_dup(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
-					 struct kmem_cache *s)
+static struct kmem_cache *memcg_create_kmem_cache(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
+						  struct kmem_cache *s)
 {
 	struct kmem_cache *new;
 	static char *tmp_name = NULL;
+	static DEFINE_MUTEX(mutex);	/* protects tmp_name */
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&memcg_cache_mutex);
+	BUG_ON(!memcg_can_account_kmem(memcg));
 
+	mutex_lock(&mutex);
 	/*
 	 * kmem_cache_create_memcg duplicates the given name and
 	 * cgroup_name for this name requires RCU context.
@@ -3434,25 +3423,13 @@ static struct kmem_cache *kmem_cache_dup(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 
 	if (new)
 		new->allocflags |= __GFP_KMEMCG;
+	else
+		new = s;
 
+	mutex_unlock(&mutex);
 	return new;
 }
 
-static struct kmem_cache *memcg_create_kmem_cache(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
-						  struct kmem_cache *cachep)
-{
-	struct kmem_cache *new_cachep;
-
-	BUG_ON(!memcg_can_account_kmem(memcg));
-
-	mutex_lock(&memcg_cache_mutex);
-	new_cachep = kmem_cache_dup(memcg, cachep);
-	if (new_cachep == NULL)
-		new_cachep = cachep;
-	mutex_unlock(&memcg_cache_mutex);
-	return new_cachep;
-}
-
 void kmem_cache_destroy_memcg_children(struct kmem_cache *s)
 {
 	struct kmem_cache *c;
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ