[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131221074900.GA6849@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 15:49:10 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc: broonie@...nel.org, b20788@...escale.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: anatop-regulator: Remove unneeded check
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 11:42:09AM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>
>
> At the 'anatop_probe_end' error path, the variable 'ret' is known to be
> non-zero, so there is no need to check it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>
> ---
> drivers/regulator/anatop-regulator.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/anatop-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/anatop-regulator.c
> index c734d09..0a3597b 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/anatop-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/anatop-regulator.c
> @@ -211,8 +211,7 @@ static int anatop_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rdev);
>
> anatop_probe_end:
> - if (ret)
> - kfree(sreg->name);
> + kfree(sreg->name);
NAK
With the change, a successful probe will end up with calling this
kfree() as well.
Shawn
>
> return ret;
> }
> --
> 1.8.1.2
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists