[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ8eaTzkKtwM2Xvw_GYRrefUVJg0uzaqFNPJcNc_ffSayQiDUA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 15:25:39 +0530
From: naveen yadav <yad.naveen@...il.com>
To: tj@...nel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] secure unlock_task_sighand() call
Dear All,
When check code , we found below issue in zap_thread function().
>From 57bf616d0e20086d73122373baf799c675f4e3d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ajeet Yadav <ajeet.yadav.77@...il.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 14:45:48 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] secure unlock_task_sighand() call
Since the return value was not checked for lock_task_sighand(),
there was a chance that spin_unlock_irqrestore being called
from unlock_task_sighand gets called wihout actually acquire
the lock, which inturn can lead to kernel crash.
Signed-off-by: Ajeet Yadav <ajeet.yadav.77@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Shinde <v.bhav.shinde@...il.com>
---
fs/coredump.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/coredump.c b/fs/coredump.c
index 6d8b4cd..447b02c 100644
--- a/fs/coredump.c
+++ b/fs/coredump.c
@@ -357,9 +357,10 @@ static inline int zap_threads(struct task_struct
*tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
do {
if (p->mm) {
if (unlikely(p->mm == mm)) {
- lock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
- nr += zap_process(p, exit_code);
- unlock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
+ if (lock_task_sighand(p, &flags) {
+ nr += zap_process(p, exit_code);
+ unlock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
+ }
}
break;
}
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists