[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1387685830.5412.37.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 05:17:10 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>
To: muli.baron@...il.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL + CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL = nogo
On Sat, 2013-12-21 at 19:21 +0200, Muli Baron wrote:
> On 21/12/2013 11:11, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> >
> > Works, modulo noisy workqueues.
> >
> > rtbox:~ # sleep 35 && killall pert& cgexec -g cpuset:rtcpus taskset -c 3 pert 5
> > [1] 5660
> > 2400.05 MHZ CPU
> > perturbation threshold 0.018 usecs.
> > pert/s: 33 >15.75us: 2 min: 0.04 max: 24.14 avg: 2.51 sum/s: 84us overhead: 0.01%
> > pert/s: 35 >15.54us: 3 min: 0.04 max: 24.89 avg: 2.39 sum/s: 84us overhead: 0.01%
> > pert/s: 30 >15.27us: 2 min: 0.04 max: 23.03 avg: 2.64 sum/s: 80us overhead: 0.01%
> > pert/s: 34 >15.12us: 3 min: 0.04 max: 25.03 avg: 2.51 sum/s: 86us overhead: 0.01%
> > pert/s: 31 >14.93us: 2 min: 0.04 max: 23.86 avg: 2.60 sum/s: 83us overhead: 0.01%
> > Terminated
> >
>
> I can confirm this works for me as well, but I have noticed some strange behavior under certain
> conditions.
Hm, so can I. Same everything, different day, nohz_full is NOT working.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists