[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpo=0HRihdTiQLk+mKiarUdXOPO3n7GCJ9CUoi=4xJ_AYcg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 16:15:06 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH Resend] cpufreq: remove sysfs files for CPU which failed
to come back after resume
On 23 December 2013 14:53, Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no> wrote:
> Confirmed. With that patch on top of the current pm-cpufreq branch all
> functionality is restored and there are no regressions AFAICS.
Thanks..
> I still don't understand why you want to add this hackish half-assed
> suspend implementation
As it is working currently, until we have a proper solution which I am
already discussing with Rafael:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/22/66
> But if you really want to implement suspend/resume, then you
> do need to keep the whole device and not just the sysfs files. Keeping
> the attribute files allow you to save and restore changed permissions,
> but it doesn't save any user modified settings.
Which settings are you talking about? I thought we are preserving all
files..
> Well, not my problem... Just wondering really.
:)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists