[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131223130438.GA5076@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 14:04:38 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.prabhu@...aro.org>, x86@...nel.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
systemtap@...rceware.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip v6 00/22] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(),
cleanup and fixes crash bugs
* Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com> wrote:
> > I can reproduce one weirdness, with just 13 probes added, 'perf probe
> > -l' [which should really be 'perf probe list'!] executes very slowly:
> >
> > # perf stat --null --repeat 3 perf probe -l
> >
> > Performance counter stats for 'perf probe -l' (3 runs):
> >
> > 0.763640098 seconds time elapsed ( +- 1.61% )
> >
> > 0.7 seconds is ridiculously long.
>
> This comes from the perf-probe's internal issue. It tries to get
> actual lines and files by using debuginfo. I guess most of the time
> consumed when processing huge kernel debuginfo.
No, I don't have any debuginfo, I never use it.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists