linux-kernel - RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/3] f2fs: check filename length in recover

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <002101ceff86$d50072c0$7f015840$@samsung.com>
Date:	Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:28:52 +0800
From:	Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
To:	jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/3] f2fs: check filename length in
 recover_dentry

Hi Kim,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 9:26 AM
> To: Chao Yu
> Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/3] f2fs: check filename length in recover_dentry
> 
> 2013-12-21 (토), 18:01 +0800, Chao Yu:
> > In current flow, we will get Null return value of f2fs_find_entry in
> > recover_dentry when name.len is bigger than F2FS_NAME_LEN, and then we
> > still add this inode into its dir entry.
> > To avoid this situation, we must check filename length before we use it.
> >
> > Another point is that we could remove the code of checking filename length
> > In f2fs_find_entry, because f2fs_lookup will be called previously to ensure of
> > validity of filename length.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/f2fs/dir.c      |    3 ---
> >  fs/f2fs/recovery.c |    5 +++++
> >  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/dir.c b/fs/f2fs/dir.c
> > index 0cc26ba..3f3b661 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/dir.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/dir.c
> > @@ -190,9 +190,6 @@ struct f2fs_dir_entry *f2fs_find_entry(struct inode *dir,
> >  	unsigned int max_depth;
> >  	unsigned int level;
> >
> > -	if (unlikely(namelen > F2FS_NAME_LEN))
> > -		return NULL;
> > -
> >  	if (npages == 0)
> >  		return NULL;
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> > index a3f4542..fdd175b 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> > @@ -62,6 +62,11 @@ static int recover_dentry(struct page *ipage, struct inode *inode)
> >
> >  	name.len = le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_namelen);
> >  	name.name = raw_inode->i_name;
> > +
> > +	if (unlikely(name.len > F2FS_NAME_LEN)) {
> > +		err = -ENAMETOOLONG;
> > +		goto out;
> > +	}
> 
> Have you seen this before?

Not yet.

> This is a trivial bug case, so, if you have got this bug, we should fix
> the bug first instead of adding any workaround patch.

What I worry about is that not only f2fs bug lead to this trivial problem,
but also other program with operation in raw disk could do this.

> Let's add WARN_ON() at least.

Alright.
Thanks.

> Thanks,
> 
> >  retry:
> >  	de = f2fs_find_entry(dir, &name, &page);
> >  	if (de && inode->i_ino == le32_to_cpu(de->ino))
> 
> --
> Jaegeuk Kim
> Samsung

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/