[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1387819238.22671.71.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 09:20:38 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Taras Kondratiuk <taras.kondratiuk@...aro.org>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, patches@...aro.org,
linaro-networking@...aro.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
Danke Xie <d.xie@....samsung.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] mfd: twl6030: Fix endianness problem in IRQ
handler
On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 19:11 +0200, Taras Kondratiuk wrote:
> From: Danke Xie <d.xie@....samsung.com>
>
> The current TWL 6030 IRQ handler assumes little endianness.
> This change makes it endian-neutral.
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c
[]
> @@ -196,8 +197,9 @@ static irqreturn_t twl6030_irq_thread(int irq, void *data)
> if (sts.bytes[2] & 0x10)
> sts.bytes[2] |= 0x08;
>
> - for (i = 0; sts.int_sts; sts.int_sts >>= 1, i++)
> - if (sts.int_sts & 0x1) {
> + int_sts = le32_to_cpu(sts.int_sts);
> + for (i = 0; int_sts; int_sts >>= 1, i++)
> + if (int_sts & 0x1) {
> int module_irq =
> irq_find_mapping(pdata->irq_domain,
> pdata->irq_mapping_tbl[i]);
instead of the
for (...) {
if (foo & 1) {
maybe using ffs would be better/faster
while ((bit = ffs(int_sts))) {
etc...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists