[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <52B7D990.2020206@samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 15:34:56 +0900
From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
To: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
Cc: rjying <rjying@...il.com>, MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
RongJun Ying <Rongjun.Ying@....com>,
Binghua Duan <Binghua.Duan@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] extcon: gpio: Add power resume support
On 12/23/2013 03:10 PM, Barry Song wrote:
> 2013/12/23 Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>:
>> On 12/20/2013 05:09 PM, rjying wrote:
>>> From: Rongjun Ying <rongjun.ying@....com>
>>>
>>> After system resume, need send extcon uevent to userspace
>>
>> Why did extcon send uevent after wakeup from suspend?
>>
>> If extcon cable is attatched or detached on suspend state,
>> Kernel can detect the interrupt about changed state of extcon.
>
> irq controller has lost power in suspend, so there is no pending interrupt.
> and HW will not pend any interrupt when we hotplug cable during sleep.
No, SoC in suspend state must maintain the minimum power under 1mA
if completed the power-optimization on suspend state.
If user insert USB cable to target, the external interrupt connected to
USB port is happened. And kernel would be waked up from suspend state
to operate proper interrupt handler of external interrupt.
Also,
Input subsystem used gpio-keys driver for power button..
If user press power button in suspend state, target would be waked up from suspend state.
It is same case both extcon gpio and gpio-keys of input subsystem.
>
>> So, kernel would execute proper operation about interrupt
>> after wakeup from suspend state.
>
> kernel only save/restore the register status of gpio, how could it
> know whether there is a pending interrupt if the HW doesn't do it?
>
>>
>> I think it isn't necessary.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Chanwoo Choi
>>
>>>
>>> Change-Id: I32a9e1c6646035f95765bba79a7acaccb8ce45a7
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rongjun Ying <rongjun.ying@....com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/extcon/extcon-gpio.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-gpio.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-gpio.c
>>> index 7e0dff5..d916522 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-gpio.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-gpio.c
>>> @@ -159,12 +159,29 @@ static int gpio_extcon_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>>> +static int gpio_extcon_resume(struct device *dev)
>>> +{
>>> + struct gpio_extcon_data *extcon_data;
>>> +
>>> + extcon_data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>> + queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq, &extcon_data->work,
>>> + extcon_data->debounce_jiffies);
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>> +static const struct dev_pm_ops gpio_extcon_pm_ops = {
>>> + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(NULL, gpio_extcon_resume)
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> static struct platform_driver gpio_extcon_driver = {
>>> .probe = gpio_extcon_probe,
>>> .remove = gpio_extcon_remove,
>>> .driver = {
>>> .name = "extcon-gpio",
>>> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>>> + .pm = &gpio_extcon_pm_ops,
>>> },
>>> };
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> -barry
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists