lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y53afzv3.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 Dec 2013 16:54:24 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Steven Rostedt \(Red Hat\)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	"David A. Long" <dave.long@...aro.org>, systemtap@...rceware.org,
	yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 3/3] perf-probe: Use the actual address as a hint for uprobes

Hi Masami,

On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 19:50:10 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2013/12/23 16:46), Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:54:38 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>>> (2013/12/21 3:03), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>>> Em Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:03:02AM +0000, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
>>> BTW, I'm not sure why debuginfo and nm shows symbol address + 0x400000,
>>> and why the perf's map/symbol can remove this offset. Could you tell me
>>> how it works?
>>> If I can get the offset (0x400000) from binary, I don't need this kind
>>> of ugly hacks...
>> 
>> AFAIK the actual symbol address is what nm (and debuginfo) shows.  But
>> perf adjusts symbol address to have a relative address from the start of
>> mapping (i.e. file offset) like below:
>> 
>> 	sym.st_value -= shdr.sh_addr - shdr.sh_offset;
>
> Thanks! this is what I really need!
>
>> This way, we can handle mmap and symbol address almost uniformly
>> (i.e. ip = map->start + symbol->address).  But this requires the mmap
>> event during perf record.  For perf probe, we might need to synthesize
>> mapping info from the section/segment header since it doesn't have the
>> mmap event.  Currently, the dso__new_map() just creates a map starts
>> from 0.
>
> I think the uprobe requires only the relative address, doesn't that?

Yes, but fetching arguments is little different than a normal relative
address, I think.

An offset of an argument bases on the mapping address of text segment.
This fits naturally for a shared library case - base address is 0.  So
we can use the symbol address (st_value) directly.  But for executables,
the base address of text segment is 0x400000 on x86-64 and data symbol
is on 0x6XXXXX typically.  So in this case the offset given to uprobe
should be "@+0x2XXXXX" (st_value - text_base).

Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ